Thayer Photo

Cameras, the software behind them, and the business of a photograph.

The archive was licensed. Nobody asked the people who made it.

Getty sued. Shutterstock signed. Then, in January 2025, they announced they were merging with each other.

Read the piece — Photographers Found Out from a Press Release

Close-up of an adult photographer's hands holding a Fujifilm X100VI, the body worn at the strap lugs, against a dark workbench surface

Shutterstock licensed the library to the model developers and put a share into a contributor fund. Getty sued Stability AI in two jurisdictions and then built a generator of its own on rights it already held. Both are defensible positions. Neither was a negotiation with the people in the files.

It is worth being precise about what actually changed, because the loud version of this story is wrong in both directions.

Getty images wordmark logo with registered trademark symbol in black text
The agreement, as most contributors met it: a company statement about a library they are in.Photo: Getty Images logo · Wikimedia Commons

The Copyright Office never wavered. Zarya of the Dawn was registered for its text and its arrangement; the generated images were refused. A machine’s output is not authored, whatever prompt produced it. That is not a temporary position awaiting better technology.

Hands holding a Leica Summicron-M 66 f/2 camera lens outdoors
Leica wrote Content Credentials into the file at capture. Nikon, Sony and Canon are on the same standard.Photo: leica-camera.com

So provenance became the camera makers’ problem, and they took it. The body signs the frame; the signature travels with it. How the credential actually works.

A picture desk with two monitors: one showing a stock library browser, the other a legal document, adult hands at the keyboard, overhead office light
A picture desk, where the question of who signed what stops being theoretical.Photo: Thirdman / Pexels

Supported by

Makers and services our editorial keeps a viewfinder on.

Three things that are true, and checkable

A file is now a legal object as well as a picture. The camera makers worked that out before the agencies did.

There are three parts to this site: the bodies people are actually buying, the software the file passes through, and the paperwork that decides what it is worth.

Also supporting

From the archive

All 26 pieces →

Fujifilm Announced the X100VI and Could Not Build Them Fast EnoughCameras

Forty Megapixels in a Body That Fits a Jacket PocketCameras

Adobe Went Subscription in 2013 and Made the Case for Everyone ElseSoftware

Capture One Grew Into the Space Adobe LeftSoftware

Photographers Found Out from a Press ReleaseThe Trade

What the Copyright Office Actually Said, and What People Think It SaidThe Trade